Hooper v. Brinson

10 Tex. 296
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 Tex. 296 (Hooper v. Brinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooper v. Brinson, 10 Tex. 296 (Tex. 1853).

Opinion

Lipscomb, J.

The appeal bond given by the appellant in this case is executed by the appellant and one security only. The statute (art. 789, Hart. Dig.) provides that “any party inking an appeal shall, within twenty days “after the term of the court at which the judgment or decree was rendered, “ enter into bond with two or more sureties, to be approved by the cleric of “ the court, in double the amount of tiro debt or damages, or the value of the “slaves or other personal property adjudged,” &c., &c. The statute is explicit in requiring two sureties to the appeal bond. There being but one, the motion to dismiss the appeal on this ground is sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

Wheeler, J-., having been of counsel, did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

International-Great Northern R. v. Smith
269 S.W. 886 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Jourdan v. Chandler
37 Tex. 55 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Tex. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-v-brinson-tex-1853.