Hooper, Tremastro v. State
This text of Hooper, Tremastro v. State (Hooper, Tremastro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 11, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-00863-CR
TREMASTRO HOOPER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 9th District Court
Waller County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 98-06-9387
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant was convicted of the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, and sentenced on February 15, 2002, to five years= incarceration in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
On November 2, 2006, this court ordered a hearing to determine why appellant's appointed counsel had not filed a brief in this appeal. On November 28, 2006, the trial court conducted the hearing. The record of the hearing was filed in this court on December 7, 2006. On December 13, 2006, a supplemental clerk=s record was filed, which contained the trial judge=s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The trial court found appellant no longer desires to prosecute his appeal.
On the basis of this finding, this court has considered the appeal without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). We find no fundamental error.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed January 11, 2007.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hooper, Tremastro v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-tremastro-v-state-texapp-2007.