Hooper-Holmes Bureau, Inc. v. Ridder

173 Misc. 735, 19 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1676
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 4, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 Misc. 735 (Hooper-Holmes Bureau, Inc. v. Ridder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooper-Holmes Bureau, Inc. v. Ridder, 173 Misc. 735, 19 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1676 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1940).

Opinion

McGeehan, J.

Motion is granted. The reports sought to be produced by subpoena duces tecum are at best hearsay statements obtained by investigation of the employees and not, therefore, evidence of any fact sought to be established in the action pending between the husband and wife. The investigations are concededly made without the knowledge of the person involved in the reports and the petitioner should not be compelled to produce the same and disclose the contents which are entirely confidential to those seeking the reports. The effect here is to obtain an inspection and discovery of reports to which neither of the parties to the action is entitled and, in the circumstances, petitioner should not assume the hazard at the time of the examination of a party objecting to the offer in evidence when in the first instance it is apparent that the reports are inadmissible as hearsay. Moreover, the witness may not on the examination raise the objection as to the incompetency of the proof, not being a party to the action. The remedy is to move for a vacatur of the subpoena and the motion is granted and subpoena vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Marahan
81 Misc. 2d 637 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 Misc. 735, 19 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-holmes-bureau-inc-v-ridder-nysupct-1940.