Hool v. BVA Credit Corp.

339 So. 2d 687, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15651
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1976·No. No. 76-116·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment entered herein by the trial court in favor of appellee is affirmed. However damages for future lease payments which would have accrued after the date of the entry of said judgment should be reduced to present worth. See Latour Auto Sales, Inc. v. Stromberg-Carlson Leasing Corp., 335 So.2d 600 (Fla.D.C. A.3d 1976).

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for re-computation of the amount of damages.

McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hool v. BVA Credit Corp., 339 So. 2d 687, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15651 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

339 So. 2d 687 (Hool v. BVA Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LATOUR AS, INC. v. Stromberg-Carlson Leasing Corp.
335 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)