Hooks v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hooks v. Willis

73 S.E. 550, 10 Ga. App. 366, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 515

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1912

Docket3566

StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 550 (Hooks v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hooks v. Willis, 73 S.E. 550, 10 Ga. App. 366, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The evidence in this case not only fully authorizes the amount of the verdict which the' plaintiff recovered, but shows that he was entitled to a larger verdict than the one found in his favor. Some immaterial errors of law occurred during the trial, but these did not affect the merits of the case, and are not of sufficient gravity to warrant another trial. The material questions raised were issues of fact, on which the jury could only have justly found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. There is no merit in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the judgment of the lower court must he affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Complaint; from city court of Leesburg — Judge Long.

June 19, 1911. W. Q-. Martin, for plaintiff in error. G. II. Beazley, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

The evidence in this case not only fully authorizes the amount of the verdict which the' plaintiff recovered, but shows that he was entitled to a larger verdict than the one found in his favor. Some immaterial errors of law occurred during the trial, but these did not affect the merits of the case, and are not of sufficient gravity to warrant another trial. The material questions raised were issues of fact, on which the jury could only have justly found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. There is no merit in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the judgment of the lower court must he affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Complaint; from city court of Leesburg — Judge Long.

June 19, 1911. W. Q-. Martin, for plaintiff in error. G. II. Beazley, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 S.E. 550, 10 Ga. App. 366, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooks-v-willis-gactapp-1912.