Hooks v. State

730 So. 2d 424, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317, 1999 WL 242394
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1999
DocketNo. 98-3213
StatusPublished

This text of 730 So. 2d 424 (Hooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooks v. State, 730 So. 2d 424, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317, 1999 WL 242394 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief in this appeal. Appellant was afforded the opportunity but did not file a brief pro se. We affirm appellant’s sentences and the imposition of a public defender’s lien based on our opinion in Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and certify the question certified in that case: DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Locke v. State
719 So. 2d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
730 So. 2d 424, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317, 1999 WL 242394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooks-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.