Hooks v. State

730 So. 2d 424, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317, 1999 WL 242394
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 1999·No. No. 98-3213·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief in this appeal. Appellant was afforded the opportunity but did not file a brief pro se. We affirm appellant’s sentences and the imposition of a public defender’s lien based on our opinion in Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and certify the question certified in that case: DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hooks v. State, 730 So. 2d 424, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317, 1999 WL 242394 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

730 So. 2d 424 (Hooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Locke v. State
719 So. 2d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)