Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hooks v. State

Hooks v. State

656 So. 2d 624, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7300, 1995 WL 387008
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 1995·No. No. 95-396·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends, and the state concedes, that the trial court did not comply with the requirements of section 921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(18)(A), in imposing an upward departure sentence. We vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing within the guidelines.

[625]*625SENTENCE VACATED and CAUSE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

BOOTH, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hooks v. State, 656 So. 2d 624, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7300, 1995 WL 387008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

656 So. 2d 624 (Hooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. State
696 So. 2d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)