Hooks v. Mayor of Wrightsville
This text of 85 S.E. 613 (Hooks v. Mayor of Wrightsville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Although the evidence introduced in support of the motion for a continuance would have warranted the grant of a continuance, the mayor did not err in overruling the motion, for the reason that it appeared from the counter-showing that the witness on account of whose absence the continuance was asked had not been subpoenaed. The mayor was the judge of the credibility of the witnesses, and the grant or refusal of the continuance was a matter within his discretion.
2. Upon the trial in the municipal court there was no error of sufficient materiality to vitiate the finding.
3. The evidence in behalf of the prosecution is weak and unsatisfactory, but, being sufficient, if credible, to have authorized the conviction, and the finding of the inferior judicatory being approved by the judge of the superior court on certiorari, this court is without jurisdiction to set aside the judgment of the trial court upon the facts.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 613, 16 Ga. App. 456, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooks-v-mayor-of-wrightsville-gactapp-1915.