Hooker v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5059
WILLIAM D. HOOKER (doing business as Georgia Bowhunters Supply),
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
Berta E. Nichols, of Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, argued for plaintiff- appellant.
Mark A. Melnick, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. On the brief were Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director, and Richard P. Schroeder, Attorney.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims
Senior Judge Robert H. Hodges, Jr. NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5059
WILLIAM D. HOOKER (doing business as Georgia Bowhunters Supply),
Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Federal Claims
In CASE NO(S). 03-CV-1501
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED November 12, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hooker v. United States (Hooker v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.