Hooker v. Story
This text of 12 F. App'x 421 (Hooker v. Story) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Virgil 0. Hooker, Dora E. Hooker, David 0. Hooker, and Gloria J. Hooker appeal from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Arkansas Chancery Judge Bentley E. Story, and from orders denying various postjudgment motions. This court has already affirmed the dismissal of this action, see Hooker v. Story, No. 98-1658, 141 F.3d 1168 (table), 1998 WL 166496 (8th Cir. Apr.7, 1998) (unpublished per curiam), and the filing of the earlier notice of appeal divested the district court of jurisdiction over subsequently filed pleadings, see Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58, 103 S.Ct. 400, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, the district court properly denied relief, and we affirm.
A true copy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 F. App'x 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooker-v-story-ca8-1999.