Hooker v. Melton Manor Condominium

212 A.D.2d 1049, 623 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1937
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 1049 (Hooker v. Melton Manor Condominium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooker v. Melton Manor Condominium, 212 A.D.2d 1049, 623 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Order unanimously [1050]*1050reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiffs failed to raise a question of fact whether defendant had actual or constructive notice of a hazardous condition on the marble steps where plaintiff Robert Hooker fell. "[A] 'general awareness’ that a dangerous condition may be present is legally insufficient to constitute notice of the particular condition that caused plaintiff’s fall” (Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp., 84 NY2d 967, 969, quoting Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838). Thus, Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s summary judgment motion. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Wesley and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lupi v. Home Creators, Inc.
265 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 1049, 623 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooker-v-melton-manor-condominium-nyappdiv-1995.