Hooker v. Hoey

107 F.2d 1016
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 20, 1939·No. 71·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

107 F.2d 1016 (1939)

George W. HOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James J. HOEY, Collector of the United States Internal Revenue for the Second District of the State of New York, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 71.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 20, 1939.

Holt S. McKinney, of New York City, for appellant.

John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Dolores C. Faconti, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed on opinion below, D. C., 27 F.Supp. 489.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hooker v. Hoey, 107 F.2d 1016 (2d Cir. 1939).

107 F.2d 1016 (Hooker v. Hoey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tesorero de Puerto Rico v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto Rico
73 P.R. Dec. 890 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1952)
Kneeland v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
88 A.2d 376 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1952)