Hooker v. Crews

Supreme Court of Florida

Hooker v. Crews

179 So. 2d 849

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 10, 1965

DocketNo. 34514

StatusPublished

This text of 179 So. 2d 849 (Hooker v. Crews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hooker v. Crews, 179 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date June 18, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI