Hooke v. . Financier Company

76 N.E. 1101, 184 N.Y. 541, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1438
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 16, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 76 N.E. 1101 (Hooke v. . Financier Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooke v. . Financier Company, 76 N.E. 1101, 184 N.Y. 541, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1438 (N.Y. 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The stipulation of the parties was plainly intended to eliminate from the appeal 'all questions relating to the amount of the judgment. We find that the contracts of employment were valid and binding obligations of the defend *542 ant, and that that part of the judgment appealed from by the plaintiff, appellant, should be reversed and the judgment as entered upon the report of the referee should be affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff in the Appellate Division and in this court.

Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hisoook and Chase,- JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 N.E. 1101, 184 N.Y. 541, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooke-v-financier-company-ny-1906.