Hooke v. Almeda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hooke v. Almeda

119 A.D.2d 473, 500 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55421

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 473 (Hooke v. Almeda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hooke v. Almeda, 119 A.D.2d 473, 500 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur E. Blyn, J.), entered on August 8, 1984, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $50,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur E. Blyn, J.), entered on August 8, 1984, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $50,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 473, 500 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooke-v-almeda-nyappdiv-1986.