Hook v. White

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hook v. White

50 A. 290, 201 Pa. 41, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 712

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 8, 1901

DocketAppeal, No. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A. 290 (Hook v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hook v. White, 50 A. 290, 201 Pa. 41, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 712 (Pa. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff appealed to this court and filed twenty-five assignments of error. An inspection of the assignments failed to convince the court of substantial error in either of them. The charge of the court to the jury was impartial and nothing appears in it which can justly be construed as depriving the plaintiff of any right or privilege he was fairly entitled to. The testimony was against his contention and was so regarded by the jury. The verdict was for the defendant and the judgment was properly entered thereon. We therefore dismiss all of the assignments.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff appealed to this court and filed twenty-five assignments of error. An inspection of the assignments failed to convince the court of substantial error in either of them. The charge of the court to the jury was impartial and nothing appears in it which can justly be construed as depriving the plaintiff of any right or privilege he was fairly entitled to. The testimony was against his contention and was so regarded by the jury. The verdict was for the defendant and the judgment was properly entered thereon. We therefore dismiss all of the assignments.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A. 290, 201 Pa. 41, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hook-v-white-pa-1901.