Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Hook v. City of Springfield

Hook v. City of Springfield

764 N.E.2d 1031, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 3, 2002
DocketNo. 01-519
StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 1031 (Hook v. City of Springfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hook v. City of Springfield, 764 N.E.2d 1031, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251 (Ohio 2002).

Opinions

The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jajfy and Alan D. Eakins, for appellant. Robin B. DeBell, Law Director, for appellee city of Springfield. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Barry M. Byron and Stephen L. Byron, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Municipal League.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial Commission
737 N.E.2d 519 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
751 N.E.2d 974 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 1031, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hook-v-city-of-springfield-ohio-2002.