Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Hook v. City of Springfield

Hook v. City of Springfield

764 N.E.2d 1031, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 2002·No. No. 01-519·Published

Opinions

The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jajfy and Alan D. Eakins, for appellant. Robin B. DeBell, Law Director, for appellee city of Springfield. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Barry M. Byron and Stephen L. Byron, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Municipal League.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hook v. City of Springfield, 764 N.E.2d 1031, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1251 (Ohio 2002).

764 N.E.2d 1031 (Hook v. City of Springfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial Commission
737 N.E.2d 519 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
751 N.E.2d 974 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)