Hook Ex Rel. Estate of Summers v. Rothstein
This text of 320 S.E.2d 35 (Hook Ex Rel. Estate of Summers v. Rothstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This is a wrongful death action brought against a physician for negligently failing to inform his patient of the risks involved in a proposed medical procedure. The Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment for the physician, holding that the appropriate standard in an informed consent case is the “professional medical standard.” Hook v. Rothstein, 316 S. E. (2d) 690 (S. C. App. 1984).
Appellant petitions this Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 55 for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals. Although a novel question of law is presented, we deny the petition because we believe the case was correctly decided.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 S.E.2d 35, 283 S.C. 64, 1984 S.C. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hook-ex-rel-estate-of-summers-v-rothstein-sc-1984.