Hoogterp v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n
922 N.W.2d 369
This text of 922 N.W.2d 369 (Hoogterp v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoogterp v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n, 922 N.W.2d 369 (Mich. 2019).
Opinion
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
CAVANAGH, J ., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
922 N.W.2d 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoogterp-v-attorney-grievance-commn-mich-2019.