Hoogs v. Robinson
174 A.D.2d 1002, 573 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8925
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 7, 1991
StatusPublished
This text of 174 A.D.2d 1002 (Hoogs v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoogs v. Robinson, 174 A.D.2d 1002, 573 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Stone, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. —Misrepresentation.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 A.D.2d 1002, 573 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoogs-v-robinson-nyappdiv-1991.