Hooge v. Sugerman
This text of Hooge v. Sugerman (Hooge v. Sugerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JORDAN M. HOOGE, Case No.: 2:25-cv-00592-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Striking Certificate of Interested Parties v. L. MICHELLE SUGERMAN, et al., 7 Defendants 8 I ORDER that the defendants’ certificate of interested parties (ECF No. 20) is 9] STRICKEN for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). The certificate does not properly identify the citizenship of defendant Steinmann Institute LLC as required by that rule because it does not identify the citizenship of each member of that limited liability company. See Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006) (stating that “an LLC is a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens”). 15 I FURTHER ORDER the defendants to file a proper certificate of interested parties by July 9, 2025. 17 DATED this 25th day of June, 2025. 18 Z, ” ANDREWP.GORDON. 0 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hooge v. Sugerman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooge-v-sugerman-nvd-2025.