Hooe v. Werner
166 U.S. 399, 41 L. Ed. 1051, 17 S. Ct. 994, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2030
Opinion
HOOE
v.
WERNER
Supreme Court of United States.
No. 373. Submitted with No. 374, above, and on the same briefs.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE:
The only difference between this case and that just decided is that the proposed amendment was allowed and the action then dismissed for want of jurisdiction. For the reasons above given, this case must take the same course as that.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hooe v. Werner, 166 U.S. 399, 41 L. Ed. 1051, 17 S. Ct. 994, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2030 (1897).
166 U.S. 399 (Hooe v. Werner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.
337 U.S. 582 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Mutual Life Insurance v. Lott
275 F. 365 (S.D. California, 1921)