Hooe v. Werner
166 U.S. 399, 41 L. Ed. 1051, 17 S. Ct. 994, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2030
This text of 166 U.S. 399 (Hooe v. Werner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hooe v. Werner, 166 U.S. 399, 41 L. Ed. 1051, 17 S. Ct. 994, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2030 (1897).
Opinion
HOOE
v.
WERNER
Supreme Court of United States.
No. 373. Submitted with No. 374, above, and on the same briefs.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE:
The only difference between this case and that just decided is that the proposed amendment was allowed and the action then dismissed for want of jurisdiction. For the reasons above given, this case must take the same course as that.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.
337 U.S. 582 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Mutual Life Insurance v. Lott
275 F. 365 (S.D. California, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 U.S. 399, 41 L. Ed. 1051, 17 S. Ct. 994, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooe-v-werner-scotus-1897.