Hood v. Webster
244 A.D. 875, 279 N.Y.S. 760
Opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Flickinger v. Glass (222 N. Y. 404) and Ochenkowski v. Dunaj (232 App. Div. 441). All concur, éxdépt Thompson and Lewis, Jj., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and a néw trial in an opinion by Thompson, j. (The judgment cancels a deed Of real property.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hood v. Webster, 244 A.D. 875, 279 N.Y.S. 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
244 A.D. 875 (Hood v. Webster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flickinger v. . Glass
118 N.E. 792 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Kirchhoff v. Gerli
171 A.D. 160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Ochenkowski v. Dunaj
232 A.D. 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Hill v. Draper
10 Barb. 454 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
Constant v. University of Rochester
133 N.Y. 640 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)