Hood v. Weaver

7 A. 137, 3 Sadler 477, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 940
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

An examination of this case convinces us that the auditor and court below did substantial justice to the contending parties, and we discover no such material error in the case as would justify us in reversing it.

The decree is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hood v. Weaver, 7 A. 137, 3 Sadler 477, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 940 (Pa. 1886).

7 A. 137 (Hood v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Lawton
34 F. 233 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri, 1888)