Hood v. Wallace

182 U.S. 555, 21 S. Ct. 885, 45 L. Ed. 1227, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1242
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 27, 1901
Docket179
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 182 U.S. 555 (Hood v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood v. Wallace, 182 U.S. 555, 21 S. Ct. 885, 45 L. Ed. 1227, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1242 (1901).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The pleadings in this case are the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, just decided. The demurrer to the answer and cross-petition of Hood was sustained in an elaborate opinion by Judge Phillips, holding the Circuit Court. 89 Fed. Rep. 11. The *556 judgment in that court was affirmed in the Circuit Court of Appeals. Lantry v. Wallace, 97 Fed. Rep. 865.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just rendered in Laritry’s case, the judgment in this case is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gallin v. National City Bank
152 Misc. 679 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Williams v. Stone
25 F.2d 831 (Fourth Circuit, 1928)
Jackman v. Continental Nat. Bank
16 F.2d 728 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)
Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.
148 N.E. 609 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Salter v. Williams
219 F. 1017 (D. New Jersey, 1914)
Scott v. Abbott
160 F. 573 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 U.S. 555, 21 S. Ct. 885, 45 L. Ed. 1227, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-wallace-scotus-1901.