Hood v. Wallace

182 U.S. 555, 21 S. Ct. 885, 45 L. Ed. 1227, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1242
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 27, 1901·No. 179·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The pleadings in this case are the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, just decided. The demurrer to the answer and cross-petition of Hood was sustained in an elaborate opinion by Judge Phillips, holding the Circuit Court. 89 Fed. Rep. 11. The *556 judgment in that court was affirmed in the Circuit Court of Appeals. Lantry v. Wallace, 97 Fed. Rep. 865.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just rendered in Laritry’s case, the judgment in this case is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hood v. Wallace, 182 U.S. 555, 21 S. Ct. 885, 45 L. Ed. 1227, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1242 (1901).

182 U.S. 555 (Hood v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gallin v. National City Bank
152 Misc. 679 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Williams v. Stone
25 F.2d 831 (Fourth Circuit, 1928)
Jackman v. Continental Nat. Bank
16 F.2d 728 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)
Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.
148 N.E. 609 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Salter v. Williams
219 F. 1017 (D. New Jersey, 1914)
Scott v. Abbott
160 F. 573 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)