Hood v. Wallace

97 F. 983, 38 C.C.A. 692, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2677
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 30, 1899·No. No. 1,222·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

THAYER, Circuit Judge.

This case was submitted at the same time, by the same counsel, on the same argument, and involves the same questions, which have been considered and decided in the preceding case of Lantry v. Wallace (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 865. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment in the ease in hand is affirmed; Judge SANBORN dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hood v. Wallace, 97 F. 983, 38 C.C.A. 692, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2677 (8th Cir. 1899).

97 F. 983 (Hood v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roth v. Hood
106 F.2d 616 (Sixth Circuit, 1939)
Gallin v. National City Bank
152 Misc. 679 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Salter v. Williams
219 F. 1017 (D. New Jersey, 1914)