Hood v. Wallace
97 F. 983, 38 C.C.A. 692, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2677
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 30, 1899
DocketNo. 1,222
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 97 F. 983 (Hood v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hood v. Wallace, 97 F. 983, 38 C.C.A. 692, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2677 (8th Cir. 1899).
Opinion
This case was submitted at the same time, by the same counsel, on the same argument, and involves the same questions, which have been considered and decided in the preceding case of Lantry v. Wallace (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 865. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment in the ease in hand is affirmed; Judge SANBORN dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roth v. Hood
106 F.2d 616 (Sixth Circuit, 1939)
Gallin v. National City Bank
152 Misc. 679 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Salter v. Williams
219 F. 1017 (D. New Jersey, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 F. 983, 38 C.C.A. 692, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-wallace-ca8-1899.