Hood v. Union Planters Bank
This text of 941 So. 2d 1175 (Hood v. Union Planters Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We dismiss the instant appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant Anthony Hood has no standing to appeal this foreclosure because he was not one of the parties named below, and made no effort to intervene. See, e.g., Stas v. Posada, 760 So.2d 954, 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Appellant Roxie Hood has not filed any documents associated with this appeal and, in fact, never filed a notice of appeal in this case. Because Anthony Hood cannot bring this appeal, and Roxie Hood has not actually appealed, we hereby dismiss the entire appeal.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
941 So. 2d 1175, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17226, 2006 WL 2955937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-union-planters-bank-fladistctapp-2006.