Hood v. Union Planters Bank

941 So. 2d 1175, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17226, 2006 WL 2955937
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 2006
DocketNo. 1D04-2184
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 941 So. 2d 1175 (Hood v. Union Planters Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood v. Union Planters Bank, 941 So. 2d 1175, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17226, 2006 WL 2955937 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

BROWNING, C.J.

We dismiss the instant appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant Anthony Hood has no standing to appeal this foreclosure because he was not one of the parties named below, and made no effort to intervene. See, e.g., Stas v. Posada, 760 So.2d 954, 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Appellant Roxie Hood has not filed any documents associated with this appeal and, in fact, never filed a notice of appeal in this case. Because Anthony Hood cannot bring this appeal, and Roxie Hood has not actually appealed, we hereby dismiss the entire appeal.

DISMISSED.

KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liliana Sanchez v. Consolidated Real Estate Investments, Etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
City of Coral Gables v. Garcia
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
941 So. 2d 1175, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17226, 2006 WL 2955937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-union-planters-bank-fladistctapp-2006.