Hood v. Swint

112 S.E. 892, 153 Ga. 708, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 155
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 22, 1922
DocketNo. 2855
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 S.E. 892 (Hood v. Swint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood v. Swint, 112 S.E. 892, 153 Ga. 708, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 155 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Hill, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the court did not err in refusing an interlocutory injunction. Board of Education of Glynn County v. Day, 128 Ga. 156 (9) (57 S. E. 359).

■Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pullen v. Johnson
160 S.E. 785 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 892, 153 Ga. 708, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-swint-ga-1922.