Hood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hood v. State

548 S.W.3d 929

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2018·No. ED 105578·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Hood appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 (2015). We have reviewed the *930briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Hood appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 (2015). We have reviewed the *930briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

Hood v. State, 548 S.W.3d 929 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

548 S.W.3d 929 (Hood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.