Hood v. State

17 So. 3d 344, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13502, 2009 WL 2900603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 2009·No. 5D09-1409·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Wright v. State, 857 So.2d 861 (Fla.2003) (holding habeas corpus should not be used as vehicle for presenting issues that should have been raised *345 at trial and on appeal, or in postconviction proceedings).

ORFINGER, LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hood v. State, 17 So. 3d 344, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13502, 2009 WL 2900603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

17 So. 3d 344 (Hood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez v. State
17 So. 3d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)