Hood v. State
808 So. 2d 1257, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2341, 2002 WL 341119
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 2002
DocketNo. 3D01-113
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 808 So. 2d 1257 (Hood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hood v. State, 808 So. 2d 1257, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2341, 2002 WL 341119 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinions
Because the defendant failed to proffer “the character of the evidence sought to be introduced,” we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by not allowing the defendant, to. reopen his case. See Jones v. State, 745 So.2d 1121, 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
GODERICH and GREEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Gibson v. State
199 So. 3d 1063 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Bryant v. State
21 So. 3d 913 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
808 So. 2d 1257, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2341, 2002 WL 341119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.