Hood v. State
642 So. 2d 665, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9056, 1994 WL 502950
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 16, 1994·No. No. 93-1472·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order revoking probation. Appellant correctly contends the revocation order is deficient in that it does not set forth the specific conditions of probation that Appellant was found to have violated. Consequently, we affirm the order revoking probation, but remand the cause for amendment of the order to reflect the specific terms and conditions of probation violated. See Cue v. State, 619 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hood v. State, 642 So. 2d 665, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9056, 1994 WL 502950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
642 So. 2d 665 (Hood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nelson v. State
670 So. 2d 193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)