Hood v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections

Eleventh Circuit

Hood v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections

228 F. App'x 926

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 2007

DocketNo. 06-15131

StatusPublished

This text of 228 F. App'x 926 (Hood v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hood v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, 228 F. App'x 926 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons that we discussed with counsel at oral argument, we are convinced that no part of the petitioner’s ineffective assistance claim is unexhausted or proeedurally barred, and the district court did not err in finding that the state court’s determination regarding the prejudice prong was an unreasonable application of the principles set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons that we discussed with counsel at oral argument, we are convinced that no part of the petitioner’s ineffective assistance claim is unexhausted or proeedurally barred, and the district court did not err in finding that the state court’s determination regarding the prejudice prong was an unreasonable application of the principles set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 F. App'x 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-secretary-for-the-department-of-corrections-ca11-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack