Hood v. Norton
51 A. 1111, 202 Pa. 120, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 477
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hood v. Norton. Read the opinion of the Court — 202 Pa. 114 →
Opinion
Opinion by
The questions raised on this appeal have been considered and passed upon in the case of Hood to the use of McCloskey v. Albert E. Norton et al., January term, 1901, No. 111, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, this day filed, the order of the court below is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hood v. Norton, 51 A. 1111, 202 Pa. 120, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 477 (Pa. 1902).
51 A. 1111 (Hood v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.