Hood v. Hood
93 A. 797, 83 N.J. Eq. 695, 13 Buchanan 695, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 404
This text of 93 A. 797 (Hood v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hood v. Hood, 93 A. 797, 83 N.J. Eq. 695, 13 Buchanan 695, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 404 (N.J. 1914).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iakd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kadiscii, Black, Bogert, Vre-
DENBURGH, IÍEPPENHEIMER, WlLLÍAMS-12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. Turro
120 A.2d 52 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Ross v. Ross
113 A.2d 700 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Gentile v. Gentile
60 A.2d 315 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Strong v. Strong
36 A.2d 410 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Rosecrans v. Rosecrans
132 A. 100 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Luebbers v. Luebbers
127 A. 83 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
93 A. 797, 83 N.J. Eq. 695, 13 Buchanan 695, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-hood-nj-1914.