Hood v. Hood

250 S.E.2d 455, 242 Ga. 581, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1288
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 21, 1978
Docket34210
StatusPublished

This text of 250 S.E.2d 455 (Hood v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood v. Hood, 250 S.E.2d 455, 242 Ga. 581, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1288 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Jordan, Justice.

This appeal arises from an order granting a divorce to the parties in this action and awarding permanent custody of the couple’s two minor children to the former husband.

Submitted November 3, 1978 Decided November 21, 1978. James R. McGraw, for appellant. Johnson, Craig & Strauss, John T. Strauss, for appellee.

Appellant-wife’s first enumeration of error is that the trial court erred when it overruled her pre-trial motion to dismiss the pleadings based on the allegation that there had been a voluntary condonation and cohabitation between the parties subsequent to the filing of this action. Appellee filed an affidavit denying reconciliation or cohabitation and restating his claim that the parties’ marriage was irretrievably broken. Appellee’s affidavit created a genuine issue of material fact which authorized the trial court to overrule appellant’s motion. Code § 81A-112. No evidence of reconciliation or cohabitation was subsequently presented. Lindsay v. Lindsay, 241 Ga. 166 (244 SE2d 8) (1978).

Appellant next asserts that her constitutional rights were violated when the trial court transferred the issue of child custody to the juvenile court for the purpose of investigation and reporting back to the superior court. This enumeration is without merit. Anderson v. Anderson, 238 Ga. 631 (235 SE2d 11) (1977). Appellant participated in a full hearing on the issue of custody and was afforded an unabridged opportunity to examine each witness who appeared before the juvenile court.

The remaining enumerations of error not being supported by citation of authority or argument are deemed to have been abandoned. Code § 24-4518 (c) (2).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Anderson
235 S.E.2d 11 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Lindsay v. Lindsay
244 S.E.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 S.E.2d 455, 242 Ga. 581, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-hood-ga-1978.