Hood v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided August 11, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-01841·Unknown

Opinion

Laurie B. Mapes, OSB #841670 lauriemapes2002@yahoo.com Attorney at Law PO Box 1241 Scappoose OR 97056 □ Voice: (503) 543-2900 Fax: (503) 543-3676 Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

SARA H.,! - Case No. 2:20-cv-01841-CL Plaintiff, V. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL "ORDER SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

Based on the stipulation of the parties and Plaintiff's application, it is ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $9,752.62 are awarded to Plaintiff under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree that Plaintiff has assigned the EAJA attorney fees to Plaintiffs attorney. The attorney fees shall be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, subject to

verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which qualifies for offset against the EAJA fees

‘In the interest of privacy, this order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the nongovernmental party in this case. ORDER - |

under the Treasury Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney, Laurie B. Mapes. If Plaintiff has such a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff. The check, regardless of the named payee, shall be mailed to Plaintiffs attorney, Laurie B. Mapes, at P.O. Box 1241, Scappoose, Oregon, 97056.

: ; L- DATED this / } day of AF CST; □ (fo a □ ne 7 LE <=

MARK D. CLARKE United States Magistrate Judge

SUBMITTED BY: s/ Laurie B. Mapes Laurie B. Mapes OSB # 841670 (503) 543-2900 Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER - 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hood v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2022).

Hood v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Hood v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)