Hood v. Board of Trustees of Sumter County School District No. 2

Fourth Circuit

Hood v. Board of Trustees of Sumter County School District No. 2

232 F.2d 626

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 25, 1956

DocketNo. 7163

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 232 F.2d 626 (Hood v. Board of Trustees of Sumter County School District No. 2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hood v. Board of Trustees of Sumter County School District No. 2, 232 F.2d 626 (4th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment in an action by school children for an injunction to prevent discrimination on the ground of race. As the denial of motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment in the case, we can entertain the appeal only by considering the denial of the motion as a denial of injunctive relief. So considered, the order denying such relief must be affirmed, as the administrative remedies prescribed by the recent South Carolina statute¹ have not been exhausted. Carson v. Board of Education of McDowell County, 4 Cir., 227 F.2d 789. As plaintiffs were not entitled to injunctive relief for this reason, we affirm the order in so far as it denies an injunction, without passing upon other [627]*627questions raised in the case or approving the reasoning of the court below in denying the motion for summary judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment in an action by school children for an injunction to prevent discrimination on the ground of race. As the denial of motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment in the case, we can entertain the appeal only by considering the denial of the motion as a denial of injunctive relief. So considered, the order denying such relief must be affirmed, as the administrative remedies prescribed by the recent South Carolina statute¹ have not been exhausted. Carson v. Board of Education of McDowell County, 4 Cir., 227 F.2d 789. As plaintiffs were not entitled to injunctive relief for this reason, we affirm the order in so far as it denies an injunction, without passing upon other [627]*627questions raised in the case or approving the reasoning of the court below in denying the motion for summary judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 F.2d 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-board-of-trustees-of-sumter-county-school-district-no-2-ca4-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack