Hood v. Bibb Brokerage Corp.

169 S.E. 110, 176 Ga. 846, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 304
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 13, 1933
DocketNo. 9255
StatusPublished

This text of 169 S.E. 110 (Hood v. Bibb Brokerage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood v. Bibb Brokerage Corp., 169 S.E. 110, 176 Ga. 846, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 304 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Under the facts and issues presented in this record, the Court of Appeals, and not the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction of the writ of error. It is therefore ordered that the case be transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. E. F. Goodrum,, for plaintiff in error. Nottingham & Nottingham, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.E. 110, 176 Ga. 846, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-bibb-brokerage-corp-ga-1933.