Hood v. Battle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hood v. Battle

89 S.E. 373, 18 Ga. App. 319, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 332

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 28, 1916

Docket6822

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 373 (Hood v. Battle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hood v. Battle, 89 S.E. 373, 18 Ga. App. 319, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 332 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Hodges, J.

It appearing, from undisputed evidence, tliat the defendant was in possession of sufficient facts to put him on actual notice and inquiry, as a prudent man, as to the nature of the “papers” held by the plaintiff against the property in controversy, the judgment is affirmed. Park’s Ann. Code, § 4530. It is unnecessary to deéide other questions raised by the record. Judgment affirmed,.

Merrill & Grantham, for plaintiff in error. Boscoe Lulce, G. E. Hay, James Humphreys, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges, J.

It appearing, from undisputed evidence, tliat the defendant was in possession of sufficient facts to put him on actual notice and inquiry, as a prudent man, as to the nature of the “papers” held by the plaintiff against the property in controversy, the judgment is affirmed. Park’s Ann. Code, § 4530. It is unnecessary to deéide other questions raised by the record. Judgment affirmed,.

Merrill & Grantham, for plaintiff in error. Boscoe Lulce, G. E. Hay, James Humphreys, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 373, 18 Ga. App. 319, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-battle-gactapp-1916.