Hood & Robinson v. Ware

34 Ga. 328
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.

[1.] In this casé the testimony clearly established the employment of plaintiffs by defendant; for he adopted the papers prepared by them, and was recognized as counsel by the counsel of libellant.

[2.] The uneontradicted evidence in the cause, was that the services rendered were worth one hundred and fifty or two hundred dollars.” The verdict was for twenty-five dollars. Being decidedly against, not only the weight, but of all the evidence on this question, the verdict must be set aside, and a new trial granted.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hood & Robinson v. Ware, 34 Ga. 328 (Ga. 1866).

34 Ga. 328 (Hood & Robinson v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Powers v. Pate
129 S.E.2d 193 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Tallent v. McKelvey
125 S.E.2d 65 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Davis v. Dula
85 S.E.2d 825 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)