Hood & Robinson v. Ware

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hood & Robinson v. Ware

34 Ga. 328

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1866

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 34 Ga. 328 (Hood & Robinson v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hood & Robinson v. Ware, 34 Ga. 328 (Ga. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Walker, J.

[1.] In this casé the testimony clearly established the employment of plaintiffs by defendant; for he adopted the papers prepared by them, and was recognized as counsel by the counsel of libellant.

[2.] The uneontradicted evidence in the cause, was that “ the services rendered were worth one hundred and fifty or two hundred dollars.” The verdict was for twenty-five dollars. Being decidedly against, not only the weight, but of all the evidence on this question, the verdict must be set aside, and a new trial granted.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, J.

[1.] In this casé the testimony clearly established the employment of plaintiffs by defendant; for he adopted the papers prepared by them, and was recognized as counsel by the counsel of libellant.

[2.] The uneontradicted evidence in the cause, was that “ the services rendered were worth one hundred and fifty or two hundred dollars.” The verdict was for twenty-five dollars. Being decidedly against, not only the weight, but of all the evidence on this question, the verdict must be set aside, and a new trial granted.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ga. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-robinson-v-ware-ga-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack