Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Hewitt

185 S.E. 161, 209 N.C. 810, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 356
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 8, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 185 S.E. 161 (Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Hewitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Hewitt, 185 S.E. 161, 209 N.C. 810, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 356 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

DEVIN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. This was an appeal from an assessment made by the Commissioner of Banks of North Carolina against the defendant as the owner of 44 shares of the capital stock of the Morris Plan Bank of Greensboro, North Carolina, an insolvent banking corporation, organized under and prior to its insolvency, doing business by virtue of the laws of North Carolina.

The assessment was made under and by authority of section 13, Public Laws of North Carolina, 1927, as amended. N.C. Code of 1935, sec. 218 (c), subsec. 13. It was filed and docketed in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Guilford County on 2 March, 1934. The defendant appealed from the assessment to the Superior Court of Guilford County, as authorized by the statute.

At the hearing of the appeal, the parties filed with the court an agreed statement of facts, which is as follows:

"The parties hereto expressly waive trial by jury and agree upon the following facts, and further agree that the judge presiding at the trial of this cause may try the same, without a jury, upon said agreed statement of facts, and render judgment, subject to the rights of the parties, or either of them, to appeal to the Supreme Court, or otherwise seek a review of such decision; the facts agreed upon being as follows:

"1. On 2 December, 1916, Greensboro Morris Plan Company was created, organized, and came into existence as a corporation; a copy of its certificate of incorporation is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit A,' and made a part hereof. On 21 April, 1920, the certificate of said corporation was amended so as to authorize an increase of capital stock; a copy of the amendment then made is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit B,' and made a part hereof. On 19 October, 1921, the certificate of incorporation of said corporation was again amended so as to change the name to `The Morris Plan Industrial Bank of Greensboro'; a copy of the amendment then made is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit C,' and made a part hereof. On 3 July, 1930, the certificate of incorporation of said corporation was again amended, and the name changed to `The *Page 812 Morris Plan Bank'; a copy of the amendment then made is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit D,' and made a part hereof. The defendant W. A. Hewitt consented to and signed the original of the last amendment to the certificate of incorporation, secured on 3 July, 1930.

"2. Shortly after the enactment of chapter 225 of the Public Laws of 1919, relating to Industrial Banks, and before 1 January, 1920, the president and secretary of said corporation filed with the Corporation Commission and the Secretary of State the notice required by said act to be recognized as an Industrial Bank and to come within the provisions of the said chapter of the Public Laws of 1919, and received from the Corporation Commission a license to do an industrial banking business; but it does not appear from the minutes of said corporation that the act of the president and secretary was or was not approved by the directors or stockholders of said corporation. After filing said notice and receiving said license the said corporation engaged in the business of an Industrial Bank until the banking holiday declared by the President in March, 1933. From time to time during said period of operation the said corporation published or caused to be published in newspapers published in the city of Greensboro advertisements by which it held itself out as doing an industrial banking business. Two typical copies of the advertisements published subsequent to 1 July, 1930, are attached hereto, marked `Exhibit E,' and made a part hereof.

"3. On 1 September, 1921, defendant W. A. Hewitt purchased eight (8) shares of stock in said corporation and paid therefor the sum of $800.00 to said corporation, whereupon a certain stock certificate, duly signed and executed, was issued and delivered to him; a copy of said stock certificate is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit F,' and made a part hereof. On 2 January, 1924, the defendant W. A. Hewitt received two (2) shares of stock in said corporation as a 25 per cent stock dividend, whereupon a certain stock certificate, duly signed and executed, was issued and delivered to him, a copy of said certificate being hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit G,' and made a part hereof. On 15 January, 1925, the defendant W. A. Hewitt purchased eight (8) shares of stock in said corporation and had the same transferred to him on the books of said corporation, whereupon a certain stock certificate, duly signed and executed, was issued and delivered to him; a copy of said certificate, except as to number and number of shares, is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit G.' On 24 January, 1924, the defendant W. A. Hewitt purchased fifteen (15) shares of stock in said corporation and had the same transferred to him on the books of said corporation, whereupon a certain stock certificate, duly signed and executed, was issued and delivered to him; a copy of said certificate, except as to number and number of shares, is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit G.' On 20 February, 1924, *Page 813 the defendant W. A. Hewitt purchased five (5) shares of stock in said corporation and had the same transferred to him on the books of said corporation, whereupon a certain stock certificate, duly signed and executed, was issued and delivered to him; a copy of said stock certificate, except as to number and number of shares, is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit G.' On the date said corporation closed and the Commissioner of Banks took possession of it, as hereinafter set forth, defendant W. A. Hewitt was the owner of all of said shares of stock, totaling thirty-eight (38) shares, in said corporation, having continuously owned said shares of stock since his purchase of them as aforesaid.

"On 21 April, 1926, defendant W. A. Hewitt purchased three (3) shares of stock in said corporation from a stockholder to whom said shares had been issued by the corporation on or before 2 January, 1924, and had said shares transferred to him on the stock books of the corporation on or about 21 April, 1926, whereupon a certain stock certificate, duly signed and executed, was issued and delivered to him; a copy of said stock certificate, except as to number and number of shares, is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit G,' and made a part hereof. On 15 March, 1928, defendant W. A. Hewitt purchased three (3) shares of stock in said corporation from a stockholder to whom said shares had been issued by the corporation on or before 2 January, 1924, and had said shares transferred to him on the stock books of the corporation on or about 15 March, 1928, whereupon a certain stock certificate, duly signed and executed, was issued and delivered to him; a copy of said stock certificate, except as to number and number of shares, is hereto annexed, marked `Exhibit G,' and made a part hereof. On the date said corporation closed and the Commissioner of Banks took possession of it, as hereinafter set forth, defendant W. A. Hewitt was the owner of both of said certificates of stock for a total of six (6) shares in said corporation, having continuously owned said shares of stock since his acquisition of them as aforesaid. That the par value of each share of stock is $100.00.

"4. Said corporation paid and defendant W. A. Hewitt received yearly dividends on each share of stock owned by him, from the date of its acquisition, as aforesaid, through the year 1932.

"5. When the national banking holiday was declared by the President in March, 1933, said corporation ceased to do an unrestricted business, and thereafter its business activities were restricted and curtailed.

"6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smathers v. Bank.
47 S.E. 893 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
Womble v. . Grocery Co.
47 S.E. 493 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 S.E. 161, 209 N.C. 810, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-comr-of-banks-v-hewitt-nc-1936.