Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Anderson

Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Anderson

187 S.E. 554, 210 N.C. 829, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 247
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 23, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.E. 554 (Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Anderson, 187 S.E. 554, 210 N.C. 829, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 247 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

Civil action to recover on two promissory notes. *Page 830

Execution of notes admitted; also their nonpayment. Defendants allege, by way of set-off and counterclaim, damages for failure to make additional loans and to discount certain automobile purchasers' notes.

From directed verdict for plaintiffs and judgment thereon the defendants appeal, assigning errors. The case is controlled by the decision in Elks v. Ins. Co., 159 N.C. 619,75 S.E. 808. The evidence offered by the defendants fails to establish contract for breach of which the plaintiffs can be held in damages.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elks v. . Insurance Co
75 S.E. 808 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 S.E. 554, 210 N.C. 829, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-comr-of-banks-v-anderson-nc-1936.