Hoober v. Hoober

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hoober v. Hoober

67 A.D.2d 697, 412 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10309

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 697 (Hoober v. Hoober) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoober v. Hoober, 67 A.D.2d 697, 412 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 13, 1977, as adjudged him to be $2,800 in arrears in alimony payments. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. In the absence of an application by the defendant for a reduction in the alimony payments due plaintiff, Special Term properly determined that plaintiff remained entitled to alimony in the amount fixed in the divorce decree. Damiani, J. P., Titone, O’Connor and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 13, 1977, as adjudged him to be $2,800 in arrears in alimony payments. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. In the absence of an application by the defendant for a reduction in the alimony payments due plaintiff, Special Term properly determined that plaintiff remained entitled to alimony in the amount fixed in the divorce decree. Damiani, J. P., Titone, O’Connor and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 697, 412 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoober-v-hoober-nyappdiv-1979.