Honsinger v. . Mulford
This text of 51 N.E. 1090 (Honsinger v. . Mulford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think this case should be affirmed upon the prevailing opinion below and upon our decision in Matthews v. Matthews (154 N. Y. 288), an authority precisely in point upon the necessity of pleading the defense of the Statute of Frauds, in order that it may be available upon the trial to defeat the validity of the contract sued upon by the plaintiff upon that ground.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 N.E. 1090, 157 N.Y. 674, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honsinger-v-mulford-ny-1898.