Honorio S. Medina v. Office of Personnel Management
This text of 45 F.3d 443 (Honorio S. Medina v. Office of Personnel Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
45 F.3d 443
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Honorio S. MEDINA, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.
No. 94-3577.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 20, 1994.
Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Mr. Honorio S. Medina appeals the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket No. DA0831940252-I-1. Mr. Medina in 1962 requested and received a full refund of his retirement contributions on termination of his employment. He has not since been employed by the United States. He thus lost all right to payment of a deferred annuity, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. Sec. 8342(a). The decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 F.3d 443, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40215, 1994 WL 706796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honorio-s-medina-v-office-of-personnel-management-cafc-1994.