Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature

New York Court of Appeals

Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature

296 N.E.2d 259, 32 N.Y.2d 688, 343 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1387

DecidedMarch 23, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 296 N.E.2d 259 (Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature, 296 N.E.2d 259, 32 N.Y.2d 688, 343 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1387 (N.Y. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division. We would hut add that the prior appeals did not preclude that court or this from approving the plan promulgated under the doctrine of law of the case (see, generally, Dall v. Time Inc., 252 App. Div. 636, 641, affd. 278 N. Y. 635, mot. for rearg. den. 278 N. Y. 718; Scott & Co. v. Scott, 186 App. Div. 518, 526; Master of Collins, 20 Misc 2d 283, 284 ; 5B C. J. S., Appeal & Error, § 1964, pp. 550-554; Ann., Law of the Case—Erroneous Decision, 87 ALR 2d 271, 275 et seq.). Under the circumstances the present plan became effective as of the time provided in the local law, the plan having been ultimately sustained.

Concur: Chief Judge Fulo and Judges Burke, Breitel,, Jasen, Cabrleulj, Jones and Wachxler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division. We would hut add that the prior appeals did not preclude that court or this from approving the plan promulgated under the doctrine of law of the case (see, generally, Dall v. Time Inc., 252 App. Div. 636, 641, affd. 278 N. Y. 635, mot. for rearg. den. 278 N. Y. 718; Scott & Co. v. Scott, 186 App. Div. 518, 526; Master of Collins, 20 Misc 2d 283, 284 ; 5B C. J. S., Appeal & Error, § 1964, pp. 550-554; Ann., Law of the Case—Erroneous Decision, 87 ALR 2d 271, 275 et seq.). Under the circumstances the present plan became effective as of the time provided in the local law, the plan having been ultimately sustained.

Concur: Chief Judge Fulo and Judges Burke, Breitel,, Jasen, Cabrleulj, Jones and Wachxler.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 N.E.2d 259, 32 N.Y.2d 688, 343 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honig-v-rensselaer-county-legislature-ny-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack