Honig v. Honig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Honig v. Honig

267 A.D. 908, 47 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5457

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 267 A.D. 908 (Honig v. Honig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Honig v. Honig, 267 A.D. 908, 47 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5457 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for a separation in which the defendant asserts that a decree of divorce obtained by the plaintiff in another State was ineffectual to dissolve her prior marriage, [909]*909because of her failure to establish a bona fide domicile in that State. Judgment in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law, without costs, and judgment directed in favor of defendant, without costs. The findings of fact (Nos. 1 to 27 inclusive) are affirmed, except that in No. 12 “ New York ” is replaced by “ Nevada ”. Conclusions of law Nos. 1, 4, and 5 are adopted. This determination is made on the authority of Lefferts V. Lefferts (263 N. Y. 131). See, also, Davis V. Davis (279 N. Y. 657). The quasi estoppel invoked in Krause v. Krause (282 N. Y. 355) does not seem to operate against a party who has not procured the foreign decree. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur. [181 Mise. 251.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for a separation in which the defendant asserts that a decree of divorce obtained by the plaintiff in another State was ineffectual to dissolve her prior marriage, [909]*909because of her failure to establish a bona fide domicile in that State. Judgment in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law, without costs, and judgment directed in favor of defendant, without costs. The findings of fact (Nos. 1 to 27 inclusive) are affirmed, except that in No. 12 “ New York ” is replaced by “ Nevada ”. Conclusions of law Nos. 1, 4, and 5 are adopted. This determination is made on the authority of Lefferts V. Lefferts (263 N. Y. 131). See, also, Davis V. Davis (279 N. Y. 657). The quasi estoppel invoked in Krause v. Krause (282 N. Y. 355) does not seem to operate against a party who has not procured the foreign decree. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur. [181 Mise. 251.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D. 908, 47 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honig-v-honig-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack