Honig v. Bloomberg

Second Circuit

Honig v. Bloomberg

334 F. App'x 452

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 22, 2009

DocketNo. 09-0198-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 334 F. App'x 452 (Honig v. Bloomberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Honig v. Bloomberg, 334 F. App'x 452 (2d Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Simon Honig appeals from the judgment of the district court dismissing his claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Honig alleged violations of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment and his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection.

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. See Honig v. Bloomberg, No. 1:08-cv-00541 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2008).

Finding no merit in Honig’s remaining arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simon Honig appeals from the judgment of the district court dismissing his claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Honig alleged violations of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment and his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection.

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. See Honig v. Bloomberg, No. 1:08-cv-00541 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2008).

Finding no merit in Honig’s remaining arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

334 F. App'x 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/honig-v-bloomberg-ca2-2009.