Hongling Wang v. Holder
This text of 324 F. App'x 604 (Hongling Wang v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Hongling Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
Wang has waived any challenge to the BIA’s February 9, 2006 order. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
To the extent Wang challenges the BIA’s April 1, 2003 order, this petition is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003); see also Martinez-Serrano, 94 F.3d at 1258 (the filing of a motion to reopen does not toll the period for filing a petition for review of an underlying order of removal).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F. App'x 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hongling-wang-v-holder-ca9-2009.